Feds flag human services grants shakeup
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
The federal government is trialling longer-term contracts for not-for-profits that deliver…
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
By Matthew Schulz, journalist, Institute of Grants Management
With billions of dollars at stake – including vast sums being allocated by governments –grantmakers are under pressure to get application procedures, assessments, reporting and outcomes right, and to avoid being featured on the front page of Australia’s biggest tabloids.
Yet many of Australia’s professional grants managers are battling with inadequate systems across tech, policies and practices.
Standardising aspects of the work makes a lot of sense, and it’s already happening in engineering, manufacturing, education, communications, policymaking and other areas.

In recent years, “standardisation” has become a hot topic for grantmakers, as governments seek to increase efficiencies, productivity and good outcomes.
The Institute of Grants Management (IGM) has been examining the issue as it applies to the grantmaking sector for the past two years, culminating this month in the publication of a white paper on the topic, The Goldilocks Zone: A practical guide for grants standardisation.
The 52-page publication comes at the right time for grantmakers, especially government operators in the federal, state and local spheres.
SmartyGrants executive director Kathy Richardson said standardisation promised a fast and effective way of improving grantmaking, increasing value for money for funders and recipients, improving transparency, compliance and quality, and reducing red tape for grantees.
The white paper’s title reflects the SmartyGrants and IGM view that the Goldilocks zone is where the balance of consistency and flexibility in grantmaking is “just right”. In the Goldilocks zone, data is kept “neat” while processes are fair yet flexible.

Richardson said the white paper drew on SmartyGrants’ two decades of experience, close analysis of SmartyGrants user practices across more than 10,000 funding programs, and the results of a national survey of users, to distil practical insights for grantmakers.
“We see our role as a conduit for knowledge exchange among experienced grantmakers, and this report helps us fulfil that role,” Richardson said.
“This white paper brings together the hard-won insights of hundreds of system users with our bird’s-eye view of the sector, giving the field a clearer line of sight on what actually works.”
She said standardisation would help users generate clearer eligibility criteria, consistent assessment, reliable reporting, stronger governance and better outcomes measurement.
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
The federal government is trialling longer-term contracts for not-for-profits that deliver…
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
A Queensland audit has made a string of critical findings about the handling of grants in a $330…
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
The federal government’s recent reforms to the Commonwealth procurement rules (CPRs) mark a pivotal…
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
With billions of dollars at stake – including vast sums being allocated by governments –grantmakers…
Posted on 15 Dec 2025
Nearly 100 grantmakers converged on Melbourne recently to address the big issues facing the…
Posted on 10 Dec 2025
Just one-in-four not-for-profits feels financially sustainable, according to a new survey by the…
Posted on 10 Dec 2025
The Foundation for Rural & Regional Renewal (FRRR) has released a new free data tool to offer…
Posted on 10 Dec 2025
A major new report says a cohesive, national, all-governments strategy is required to ensure better…
Posted on 08 Dec 2025
A pioneering welfare effort that helps solo mums into self-employment, a First Nations-led impact…
Posted on 24 Nov 2025
The deployment of third-party grant assessors can reduce the risks to funders of corruption,…
Posted on 21 Oct 2025
An artificial intelligence tool to help not-for-profits and charities craft stronger grant…
Posted on 21 Oct 2025
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an essential tool for not-for-profits seeking to win…